Abstract
In an article recently published in this journal, I raised a puzzle about the control of genetic information, suggesting a situation in which it might turn out that we have a duty to remain in ignorance about at least some aspects of our own genome. In this article, I propose a way that would make sense of how the puzzle arises, and offer a way to resolve it and similar puzzles in future: in essence, we would consider genetic information to be something the distribution of which may be more or less just. We would not know in advance what a just distribution would be, though, and in some cases there might still be a justice-based reason to deny a person genetic information about himself. However, others might also have justice-based claims to be able to access that information. This suggests that there is a possible world in which one person is entitled to at least some genetic information about another, while that other person - to whom the information refers - is not, and that this world would be just. © 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 231-246 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Keywords
- Genetic information
- Insurance
- Justice
- Privacy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Genetic information: Making a just world strange'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver