Getting the most out of multidisciplinary teams: A multi-sample study of team innovation in health care

Doris Fay, Carol Borrill, Ziv Amir, Robert Haward, Michael A. West

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Driven by the assumption that multidisciplinarity contributes positively to team outcomes teams are often deliberately staffed such that they comprise multiple disciplines. However, the diversity literature suggests that multidisciplinarity may not always benefit a team. This study departs from the notion of a linear, positive effect of multidisciplinarity and tests its contingency on the quality of team processes. It was assumed that multidisciplinarity only contributes to team outcomes if the quality of team processes is high. This hypothesis was tested in two independent samples of health care workers (N = 66 and N = 95 teams), using team innovation as the outcome variable. Results support the hypothesis for the quality of innovation, rather than the number of innovations introduced by the teams. © 2006 The British Psychological Society.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)553-567
    Number of pages14
    JournalJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
    Volume79
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2006

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Getting the most out of multidisciplinary teams: A multi-sample study of team innovation in health care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this