TY - JOUR
T1 - Glaucoma detection
T2 - The content of optometric eye examinations for a presbyopic patient of African racial descent
AU - Shah, R.
AU - Edgar, D. F.
AU - Spry, P. G.
AU - Harper, R. A.
AU - Kotecha, A.
AU - Rughani, S.
AU - Evans, B. J W
PY - 2009/4
Y1 - 2009/4
N2 - Aims: Standardised patient (SP) methodology is the gold standard for evaluating clinical practice. We investigated the content of optometric eyecare for an early presbyopic SP of African racial descent, an ''at-risk'' patient group for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods: A trained actor presented unannounced as a 44-year-old patient of African racial descent, complaining of recent near vision difficulties, to 100 community optometrists for an audio-recorded eye examination. The eye examinations were subsequently assessed via a checklist based on evidence-based POAG reviews, clinical guidelines and expert panel opinion. Results: Ninety-five per cent of optometrists carried out optic disc assessment and tonometry, which conforms to the UK College of Optometrists' advice that those patients aged .40 years should receive at least two of the following tests: tonometry, optic disc assessment, visual field testing. Thirty-five per cent of optometrists carried out all of these tests and 6% advised the SP of increased POAG risk in those of African racial descent. Conclusion: SP encounters are an effective measure of optometric clinical practice. As in other healthcare disciplines, there are substantial differences between optometrists in the depth of their clinical investigations, challenging the concept of a ''standard sight test''. There is a need for continuing professional development (CPD) in glaucoma screening, in which the increased risk of POAG in those of African racial descent should be emphasised.
AB - Aims: Standardised patient (SP) methodology is the gold standard for evaluating clinical practice. We investigated the content of optometric eyecare for an early presbyopic SP of African racial descent, an ''at-risk'' patient group for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods: A trained actor presented unannounced as a 44-year-old patient of African racial descent, complaining of recent near vision difficulties, to 100 community optometrists for an audio-recorded eye examination. The eye examinations were subsequently assessed via a checklist based on evidence-based POAG reviews, clinical guidelines and expert panel opinion. Results: Ninety-five per cent of optometrists carried out optic disc assessment and tonometry, which conforms to the UK College of Optometrists' advice that those patients aged .40 years should receive at least two of the following tests: tonometry, optic disc assessment, visual field testing. Thirty-five per cent of optometrists carried out all of these tests and 6% advised the SP of increased POAG risk in those of African racial descent. Conclusion: SP encounters are an effective measure of optometric clinical practice. As in other healthcare disciplines, there are substantial differences between optometrists in the depth of their clinical investigations, challenging the concept of a ''standard sight test''. There is a need for continuing professional development (CPD) in glaucoma screening, in which the increased risk of POAG in those of African racial descent should be emphasised.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64849116445&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bjo.2008.145623
DO - 10.1136/bjo.2008.145623
M3 - Article
C2 - 19060011
AN - SCOPUS:64849116445
SN - 0007-1161
VL - 93
SP - 492
EP - 496
JO - British Journal Of Ophthalmology
JF - British Journal Of Ophthalmology
IS - 4
ER -