Global buckling capacity of axially loaded pultruded FRP columns with doubly symmetric cross section

Yang Zhan, Zhangjian Wu, Jing Cui, Yaqiang Yang, Benben Li

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

68 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Accurate prediction of buckling strength is essential for the reliable, efficient, and safe design of thin-walled pultruded fiber-reinforced polymer (PFRP) columns. This paper presents the comparison of the
existing six closed-form solutions based on the test database. Analysis of the experimental data from the database indicates that the Euler formula is the most unconservative of all equations (except for the equations recommedned by Strongwell Corporation) in predicting the global buckling loads of PFRP columns. The Engesser and Haringx shear correction formulae exhibit better performance than the Euler formula. The equation recommended by Fiberline Composites is observed to underestimate actual
buckling capacity and is the only conservative prediction of those equations. The equations proposed by Strongwell Corporation appear to be incapable of reasonably predicting the global buckling loads of PFRP columns. The formula developed by Zhan et al. gives the most accurate predictions.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages5
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2019
EventAsia-Pacific Conference on FRP in Structures - Surfers Paradise, Gold Coast, Australia
Duration: 10 Dec 201913 Dec 2019
Conference number: 7th
https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85085667940&origin=inward&txGid=2abbe399f556b29aa342968cb1f5e850

Conference

ConferenceAsia-Pacific Conference on FRP in Structures
Abbreviated titleAPFIS 2019
Country/TerritoryAustralia
CityGold Coast
Period10/12/1913/12/19
Internet address

Keywords

  • PFRP columns, global buckling capacity, closed-form equations, prediction accuracy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Global buckling capacity of axially loaded pultruded FRP columns with doubly symmetric cross section'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this