Global uncertainty in the diagnosis of neurological complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection by both neurologists and non-neurologists: An international inter-observer variability study

Global NeuroResearch Coalition, A. A. Tamborska, G. K. Wood, E. Westenberg, D. Garcia-Azorin, G. Webb, N. Schiess, M. Netravathi, B. Baykan, R. Dervaj, R. Helbok, S. Lant, A. Özge, A. Padovani, D. Saylor, E. Schmutzhard, A. Easton, J. B. Lilleker, T. Jackson, E. BeghiM. A. Ellul, J. A. Frontera, T. Pollak, T. R. Nicholson, N. Wood, K. T. Thakur, T. Solomon, R. J. Stark, A. S. Winkler, B. D. Michael*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Uniform case definitions are required to ensure harmonised reporting of neurological syndromes associated with SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, it is unclear how clinicians perceive the relative importance of SARS-CoV-2 in neurological syndromes, which risks under- or over-reporting. Methods: We invited clinicians through global networks, including the World Federation of Neurology, to assess ten anonymised vignettes of SARS-CoV-2 neurological syndromes. Using standardised case definitions, clinicians assigned a diagnosis and ranked association with SARS-CoV-2. We compared diagnostic accuracy and assigned association ranks between different settings and specialties and calculated inter-rater agreement for case definitions as “poor” (κ ≤ 0.4), “moderate” or “good” (κ > 0.6). Results: 1265 diagnoses were assigned by 146 participants from 45 countries on six continents. The highest correct proportion were cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST, 95.8%), Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS, 92.4%) and headache (91.6%) and the lowest encephalitis (72.8%), psychosis (53.8%) and encephalopathy (43.2%). Diagnostic accuracy was similar between neurologists and non-neurologists (median score 8 vs. 7/10, p = 0.1). Good inter-rater agreement was observed for five diagnoses: cranial neuropathy, headache, myelitis, CVST, and GBS and poor agreement for encephalopathy. In 13% of vignettes, clinicians incorrectly assigned lowest association ranks, regardless of setting and specialty. Conclusion: The case definitions can help with reporting of neurological complications of SARS-CoV-2, also in settings with few neurologists. However, encephalopathy, encephalitis, and psychosis were often misdiagnosed, and clinicians underestimated the association with SARS-CoV-2. Future work should refine the case definitions and provide training if global reporting of neurological syndromes associated with SARS-CoV-2 is to be robust.

Original languageEnglish
Article number120646
JournalJOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume449
Early online date11 Apr 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jun 2023

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Diagnosis
  • Inter-rater agreement
  • Neurology
  • SARS-CoV-2

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Global uncertainty in the diagnosis of neurological complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection by both neurologists and non-neurologists: An international inter-observer variability study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this