Good and bad institutions: Is the debate over? Cross-country firm-level evidence from the textile industry

Sumon Kumar Bhaumik, Ralitza Dimova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Using firm-level data from nine developing countries, we demonstrate that certain institutions, like restrictive labour market regulations, that are considered bad for economic growth might be beneficial for production efficiency, whereas good business environment, which is considered beneficial for economic growth, might have an adverse impact on production efficiency. We argue that our results suggest that there might be significant difference in the macro- and micro-impacts of institutional quality, such that the classification of institutions into 'good' and 'bad might be premature. © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)109-126
Number of pages17
JournalCambridge Journal of Economics
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014

Keywords

  • Institutional quality
  • Production efficiency
  • Stochastic frontier model

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Global Development Institute

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Good and bad institutions: Is the debate over? Cross-country firm-level evidence from the textile industry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this