Good weasel hunting

Robert Knowles, David Liggins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

345 Downloads (Pure)


The ‘indispensability argument’ for the existence of mathematical objects appeals to the role mathematics plays in science. In a series of publications, Joseph Melia has offered a distinctive reply to the indispensability argument. The purpose of this paper is to clarify Melia’s response to the indispensability argument and to advise Melia and his critics on how best to carry forward the debate. We will begin by presenting Melia’s response and diagnosing some recent misunderstandings of it. Then we will discuss four avenues for replying to Melia. We will argue that the three replies pursued in the literature so far are unpromising. We will then propose one new reply that is much more powerful, and—in the light of this—advise participants in the debate where to focus their energies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3397-3412
Number of pages15
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - 2015


  • Weaseling
  • The indispensability argument
  • Philosophy of mathematics


Dive into the research topics of 'Good weasel hunting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this