Guidelines for molecular karyotyping in constitutional genetic diagnosis

Joris Robert Vermeesch, Heike Fiegler, Nicole de Leeuw, Karoly Szuhai, Jacqueline Schoumans, Roberto Ciccone, Frank Speleman, Anita Rauch, Jill Clayton-Smith, Conny Van Ravenswaaij, Damien Sanlaville, Philippos C. Patsalis, Helen Firth, Koen Devriendt, Orsetta Zuffardi

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Array-based whole genome investigation or molecular karyotyping enables the genome-wide detection of submicroscopic imbalances. Proof-of-principle experiments have demonstrated that molecular karyotyping outperforms conventional karyotyping with regard to detection of chromosomal imbalances. This article identifies areas for which the technology seems matured and areas that require more investigations. Molecular karyotyping should be part of the genetic diagnostic work-up of patients with developmental disorders. For the implementation of the technique for other constitutional indications and in prenatal diagnosis, more research is appropriate. Also, the article aims to provide best practice guidelines for the application of array comparative genomic hybridisation to ensure both technical and clinical quality criteria that will optimise and standardise results and reports in diagnostic laboratories. In short, both the specificity and the sensitivity of the arrays should be evaluated in every laboratory offering the diagnostic test. Internal and external quality control programmes are urgently needed to evaluate and standardise the test results between laboratories.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1105-1114
    Number of pages9
    JournalEuropean Journal of Human Genetics
    Volume15
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2007

    Keywords

    • Array CGH
    • Best practice guidelines
    • Copy number changes
    • Genome-wide screening
    • Molecular karyotype

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Guidelines for molecular karyotyping in constitutional genetic diagnosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this