Guilt, shame and expressed emotion in carers of people with long-term mental health difficulties: a systematic review

Mary Gemma Cherry, Peter Taylor, Stephen Lloyd Brown, Jake Wilfred Rigby, William Sellwood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

235 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Expressed emotion (EE) is a global index of familial emotional climate, whose primary components are emotional over-involvement (EOI) and critical comments (CC)/hostility. There is a strong theoretical rationale for hypothesising that carers’ guilt and shame may be differentially associated with their EOI and CC/hostility respectively. This systematic review investigates the magnitude of these theorised associations in carers of people with long-term mental health difficulties. Electronic searches (conducted in May 2016 across Medline, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO and ProQuest) were supplemented with iterative hand searches. Ten papers, reporting data from eight studies, were included. Risk of bias was assessed using a standardised checklist. Relevant data were extracted and synthesised narratively. EOI was positively associated with both guilt and shame, whereas CC/hostility was positively associated with shame. The strength of associations varied depending on whether or not guilt and shame were assessed within the context of the caring relationship. Based on these data, an argument can be made for the refinement, development and evaluation of systemic and individual interventions designed to target carers’ guilt and shame. However, more research is needed to clarify the strength of these associations and their direction of effect before firm conclusions can be drawn.

Key words: emotional over-involvement; critical comments; hostility; family interventions; systemic practice; clinical psychology.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPsychiatry Research
Volume249
Early online date5 Jan 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Guilt, shame and expressed emotion in carers of people with long-term mental health difficulties: a systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this