“Havens of mercy”: health, medical research, and the governance of the movement of dogs in twentieth-century America

Robert G. W. Kirk, Edmund Ramsden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article argues that the movement of dogs from pounds to medical
laboratories played a critically important role in debates over the use of animals in science and medicine in the United States in the twentieth century, not least by drawing the scientifc community into every greater engagement with bureaucratic political governance. If we are to understand the unique characteristics of the American federal legislation that emerges in the 1960s, we need to understand the long and protracted debate over the use of pound animals at the local municipal and state level between antivivisectionists, humane activists, and scientifc and medical researchers. We argue that the Laboratory Animal Care Act of 1966 refects the slow evolution of a strategy that proved most successful in local conficts, and which would characterize a “new humanitarianism”: not the regulation of experimental practices but of the care and transportation of the animals being provided to the laboratory.
Our analysis is consistent with, and draws upon, scholarship which has established the productive power of public agencies and civil society on the periphery of the American state.
Original languageEnglish
JournalHistory and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
Volume43
Issue number4
Early online date2 Dec 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Dec 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“Havens of mercy”: health, medical research, and the governance of the movement of dogs in twentieth-century America'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this