Abstract
This rejoinder demonstrates that the arguments made in AT (2006) are not robust and the case against non-monotonic HRSWF and their empirics remain overwhelming. © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 426-429 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | Journal of Health Economics |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2007 |
Keywords
- Health inequality
- Non-monotonicity
- Social welfare function