Hegel After Ulysses? The (Dis)Appearance of Politics in “Cyclops”

Graham MacPhee*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This essay challenges the dismissal of nationalist politics in readings of Ulysses by reconnecting the “Cyclops” episode to the aporias of modern political thought. Drawing on Joyce’s neglected notes to the episode, it relocates anti-colonial nationalism within the diremption and mutual implication of civil society and state, first articulated by G. W. F. Hegel and developed by Hannah Arendt. The essay rereads Hegel’s state/society diremption through Gillian Rose’s conception of “speculative thinking” and the historical openness of the “broken middle.” It argues that the episode generates a dynamic interpretative space able to register other configurations of the social and political in the nation. In a contemporary moment when legality and constitutionality are under attack in the name of the national popular, this reading suggests an alternative to frameworks that only conceive of law as violence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)293-328
Number of pages36
JournalTwentieth Century Literature
Volume69
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2023

Keywords

  • anticolonial nationalism
  • civil society
  • Gillian Rose
  • Hannah Arendt
  • modernism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hegel After Ulysses? The (Dis)Appearance of Politics in “Cyclops”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this