Herding cats? Management and university performance

J. Mccormack, C. Propper, Sarah Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Using a tried and tested measure of management practices that has been shown to predict firm performance, we survey nearly 250 departments across 100+ UK universities. We find large differences in management scores across universities and that departments in older, research‐intensive universities score higher than departments in newer, more teaching‐oriented universities. We also find that management matters in universities. The scores, particularly with respect to provision of incentives for staff recruitment, retention and promotion are correlated with both teaching and research performance conditional on resources and past performance. Moreover, this relationship holds for all universities, not just research‐intensive ones.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)F534–F564
Number of pages31
JournalThe Economic Journal
Volume124
Issue number578
Early online date26 Mar 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Herding cats? Management and university performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this