How leaders differentially motivate safety compliance and safety participation: The role of monitoring, inspiring, and learning

Mark Griffin, X. Hu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study examined the impact of specific leader behaviours on employee’s safety performance. Based on self-regulation framework, we examined three safety-specific leader behaviours: safety inspiring, safety monitoring, and safety learning on two distinct employee safety behaviours: safety participation and safety compliance. First, we demonstrated via confirmatory factor analysis that the three different safety-specific leader behaviours and the two employee safety behaviours are five distinct behavioural constructs. Then, using path analysis, we found that while safety inspiring is positively and specifically related to safety participation, safety monitoring is positively and specifically related to safety compliance. Further, we also showed that the relationship between safety monitoring and safety participation can be moderated by the degree to which leaders encourage safety related learning. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)196-202
Number of pages7
JournalSafety Science
Volume60
Early online date15 Aug 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013

Keywords

  • safety leadership
  • safety compliance
  • safety participation
  • self-regulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How leaders differentially motivate safety compliance and safety participation: The role of monitoring, inspiring, and learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this