Abstract
We study the relationship between growth and volatility in a simple analytical model, where human capital accumulation depends on both deliberate and non-deliberate learning, and where stochastic fluctuations arise from both preference and technology shocks. We derive a number of new results which challenge some of the results in the existing literature. First, we show that the optimal allocations of time to working and learning are both pro-cyclical. Second, we identify a preference parameter (other than the coefficient of relative risk aversion) that is potentially crucial for governing the effect of volatility on growth. Third, we demonstrate how this effect can be either positive or negative under each type of learning, the relative importance of which is irrelevant to the outcome. Fourth, we reveal how the effect may also be different for the two types of shock. Our results may be seen as providing further explanation for the lack of robust evidence on the issue. © 2007 Springer-Verlag.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 435-452 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Economic Theory |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2008 |
Keywords
- Growth
- Human capital
- Learning
- Volatility