Hunting gruffalo: 'gangs', unreason and the big bad coalition: Jon Shute and Juanjo Medina point to the rhetoric and inaccuracies behind recent policy responses

Jon Shute, Juanjo Medina

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    130 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    But who is this creature with terrible claws/And terrible teeth in its terrible jaws?/He has knobbly knees and turned out toes/And a poisonous wart on the end of his nose/His eyes are orange, his tongue is black/He has purple prickles all over his back/Oh help! Oh no! It's a Gruffalo!(Donaldson, 1999)Youth violence, like most other forms of violence has been falling steadily in recent years. Despite - or perhaps because of this - recent policy responses have begun to rely increasingly on the spectre of 'the gang' as a trope for representing serious youth crime, invoking moral panic, and justifying greater police powers in socially marginalised communities (Hallsworth, 2013). The cynical disconnect between this and the growing weight of critical, empirical British youth gang research strains belief, and exposes the unreason at the heart of coalition policy. In this article, we analyse the release of several reports relating to the 2011 policy paper Ending Gang and Youth Violence (HM Government, 2011). Amidst the rambling and turgid prose, we find a government wasting £10 million on untheorised, unevidenced, and unevaluated 'activity' that risks reifying the very problem it claims to fear. ©2013 Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)26-27
    Number of pages1
    JournalCriminal Justice Matters
    Volume96
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Hunting gruffalo: 'gangs', unreason and the big bad coalition: Jon Shute and Juanjo Medina point to the rhetoric and inaccuracies behind recent policy responses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this