I gave my child life but i also gave her death

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


The capacity for a complex inner life-encompassing inner speech, imaginative reverie and unarticulated moods-is an essential feature of living with illness and a principal means through which people interpret, understand and manage their condition. Nevertheless, as Nigel Rapport has pointed out in a recent edition of The Australian Journal of Anthropology (2008: 19 (3)), interiority largely remains a 'terra-incognita' for social science, while anthropology lacks a generally accepted theory or methodological framework for understanding how interiority relates to people's public actions and expressions. Moreover, as conventional social-scientific methods are often too static to understand the fluidity of perception among people living with illness or bodily instability, I argue we need to develop new, practical approaches to knowing. By placing the problem of interiority directly into the field and turning it into an ethnographic, practice-based question to be addressed through fieldwork in collaboration with informants, this article works alongside women living with HIV/AIDS in Uganda with the aim of capturing the unvoiced but sometimes radical changes in being, belief and perception that accompany terminal illness. © 2011 Australian Anthropological Society.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)332-350
Number of pages18
JournalThe Australian Journal of Anthropology
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011


Dive into the research topics of 'I gave my child life but i also gave her death'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this