Abstract
In this article, the authors demonstrate how discursive psychology may be applied to the analysis of eyewitness accounts of paramilitary-related violence in North Belfast, Ireland. Eyewitnesses are in a powerful position to construct reality for others in their community, but such accounts can easily be dismissed as partisan characterisations of events. The authors therefore demonstrate some of the ways in which these accounts are made difficult to undermine, how they are rhetorically designed to undermine alternative versions of events, and hour blamings and mitigations may be achieved through the construction of the social identities of the individuals in Me events as blameless victims or as ruthless perpetrators. They further consider how it is made discursively possible for ''blameless'' victims to exist alongside ''professional'' hitmen through the construction of assailants as professional but also personally flawed and this therefore compromises their claim to rational, political motivations for violence.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 408-433 |
Journal | JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY |
Volume | 14 |
Publication status | Published - 1995 |
Keywords
- CATEGORIES; MODEL