Identification of COPD Inflammatory Endotypes Using Repeated Sputum Eosinophil Counts

Augusta Beech, Natalie Jackson, Dave Singh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Higher blood and sputum eosinophil counts are associated with a greater response to corticosteroids in COPD. Low blood eosinophil counts exhibit greater stability over time whereas higher counts demonstrate more variability. Stability of airway eosinophil levels is less well understood. We have studied the stability of sputum eosinophil counts. Differential cell count data for COPD patients (n = 100) were analysed. Subjects with two sputum eosinophil counts, 6 months apart, were included in the analysis. Patients were stratified based on baseline sputum eosinophil count into 'low', 'intermediate' and 'high' groups: eosinophilLOW (<1%), eosinophilINT (1-3%) and eosinophilHIGH (≥3%). Sputum eosinophil counts showed good stability (rho = 0.61, p < 0.0001, ICC of 0.77), with 67.4% of eosinophilLOW patients remaining in the same category on repeat sampling. Bland-Altman analysis of the whole cohort (median difference between measurements = 0.00%, 90th percentile = -1.4 and 4.7%) showed greater variation at higher counts. This was confirmed by the wider 90th centiles in the eosinophilINT (-1.50 to 5.65) and eosinophilHIGH groups (-5.33 to 9.80) compared to the eosinophilLOW group (-0.40 to 1.40). The repeatability of sputum eosinophil counts was related to the baseline eosinophil count; sputum eosinophilLOW COPD patients were relatively stable over time, while the eosinophilHIGH group showed greater variability. These results can facilitate the identification of COPD endotypes with differential responses to treatment.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2611
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - 18 Oct 2022


  • COPD
  • endotype
  • eosinophil
  • eosinophil repeatability
  • microbiome
  • sputum


Dive into the research topics of 'Identification of COPD Inflammatory Endotypes Using Repeated Sputum Eosinophil Counts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this