Abstract
Considerable effort has been invested in improving assessment processes for older people, some of the most vulnerable of whom live in care homes. The paper compares two well-known assessment tools used in care homes, the CANE and the Minimum Data Set/Resident Assessment Instrument. There was poor agreement between the tools in terms of domains of need covered. Nineteen pairs of items could be compared, with agreement greater than 60% found on 11 items. Of the 15 items where κ could be computed, seven significant values were found. High levels of agreement existed in relation to behaviour, psychological wellbeing, mood state, psychotic symptoms, incontinence, mobility and inadvertent self-harm (risk). The study suggests that tools commonly used for assessment are not interchangeable and that the selection of assessment tool should be determined by the setting in which it is used, the needs of the population being assessed, the skills and knowledge of those undertaking the assessment and the purpose of the assessment itself. © 2008 Taylor & Francis.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 719-728 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Aging and Mental Health |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2008 |
Keywords
- Assessment
- CANE
- Care homes
- Dementia
- MDS/RAI
- Older people