IDENTIFYING THE BEST METHODS TO REPORT ON THE POST-VACCINATION SURVEILLANCE OF PHYSICAL SIDE-EFFECTS OF THE COVID-19 VACCINES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Alice Reid, Finn Highfield, Arpana Verma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: On the 11th of March 2020, the World Health Organisation declared COVID-19 to be a global pandemic. This had led to the development of many novel vaccines for which effective post-vaccination surveillance is essential. This study aims to synthesise post-vaccination surveillance of physical side-effects to learn the best method that can be applied to the surveillance of novel COVID-19 vaccines.
Methods: A full systematic search was performed on four databases following the PRISMA guidelines. Following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and hand-searching the eligible papers, a total of seven studies were included in this review. The risk of bias within studies and their quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal for Public Health Checklist.
Results: The seven studies included were from six countries representing both active and passive surveillance systems. The results showed reliability and reproducibility between data across countries. They also provided a good framework for how post-vaccination surveillance can be performed in low-income countries.
Conclusions: The reporting of post-vaccine side-effects is essential. Active and passive systems were essential to encourage reporting of AEFIs and should be encouraged globally. A combination of active and passive surveillance should be used to monitor adverse events relating to the novel COVID-19 vaccines.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSystematic Reviews in Pharmacy
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 17 Dec 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'IDENTIFYING THE BEST METHODS TO REPORT ON THE POST-VACCINATION SURVEILLANCE OF PHYSICAL SIDE-EFFECTS OF THE COVID-19 VACCINES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this