Identifying the deficiencies of current diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis 2 using databases of 2777 individuals with molecular testing

Purpose: We have evaluated deficiencies in existing diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2).

Methods: Two large databases of individuals fulfilling NF2 criteria (n=1361) and those tested for NF2 variants with criteria short of diagnosis (n=1416) were interrogated. We assessed the proportions meeting each diagnostic criterion with constitutional or mosaic NF2 variants and the Positive Predictive Value (PPV) with regard to definite diagnosis.

Results: There was no evidence for usefulness of old criteria ‘glioma’ or ‘neurofibroma’. ‘Ependymoma’ had 100% PPV and high levels of confirmed NF2 diagnosis (67.7%). Those with bilateral vestibular schwannoma (VS) alone aged ≥60 years had the lowest confirmation rate (6.6%) and reduced PPV(80%). Siblings as a first-degree-relative, without an affected parent, had 0% PPV. All three individuals with unilateral VS and an affected sibling were proven not to have NF2. The biggest overlap was with LZTR1-associated schwannomatosis. In this category, seven individuals with unilateral VS plus ≥2 non-dermal schwannomas reduced PPV to 67%.

Conclusion: The present study has confirmed important deficiencies in NF2 diagnostic criteria. The term ‘glioma’ should be dropped and replaced by ‘ependymoma’. Similarly ‘neurofibroma’ should be removed. Dropping ‘sibling’ from first-degree-relatives should be considered and testing of LZTR1 should be recommended for unilateral VS.