Image-guided radiotherapy residual setup errors linked to overall survival in lung cancer patients

Corinne N. Johnson, Gareth J Price, Corinne Faivre-Finn, Marcel van Herk

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Participants viewed a videotape of a simulated murder, and their recall (and confidence) was tested 1 week later with the cognitive interview. Results indicated that (a) the subset of statements assigned high confidence was more accurate than the full set of statements; (b) the accuracy benefit was limited to information that forensic experts considered relevant to an investigation, whereas peripheral information showed the opposite pattern; (c) the confidence-accuracy relationship was higher for relevant than for peripheral information; (d) the focused-retrieval phase was associated with a greater proportion of peripheral and a lesser proportion of relevant information than the other phases; and (e) only about 50% of the relevant information was elicited, and most of this was elicited in Phase 1., (C) 2002 by the American Psychological Association
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEuropean Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Publication series

NameEuropean Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Manchester Cancer Research Centre

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Image-guided radiotherapy residual setup errors linked to overall survival in lung cancer patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this