Abstract
This paper analyses statistical data concerning immigration judicial reviews (IJRs) since their transfer to the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (UTIAC). The paper makes the following findings: (i) both the number and proportion of claims certified as Totally Without Merit (TWM) have increased; (ii) very few claims proceed to a substantive hearing; many are settled out of court; and (iii) the length of time claims taken to get to substantive decisions has increased. There is a discussion about caseload, resources, and judicial behaviour.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 209-220 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Judicial Review |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 31 Oct 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Keywords
- Immigration judicial reviews, administrative law, judicial resources