Immigration Judicial Reviews: Resources, Caseload, and ‘System-manageability efficiency’

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

314 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper analyses statistical data concerning immigration judicial reviews (IJRs) since their transfer to the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (UTIAC). The paper makes the following findings: (i) both the number and proportion of claims certified as Totally Without Merit (TWM) have increased; (ii) very few claims proceed to a substantive hearing; many are settled out of court; and (iii) the length of time claims taken to get to substantive decisions has increased. There is a discussion about caseload, resources, and judicial behaviour.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)209-220
Number of pages11
JournalJudicial Review
Volume21
Issue number3
Early online date31 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Immigration judicial reviews, administrative law, judicial resources

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Immigration Judicial Reviews: Resources, Caseload, and ‘System-manageability efficiency’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this