Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of Access Site Practice on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following Thrombolysis for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United Kingdom: An Insight From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Dataset

  • Muhammad Rashid*
  • , Claire A. Rushton
  • , Chun Shing Kwok
  • , Tim Kinnaird
  • , Evangelos Kontopantelis
  • , Ivan Olier
  • , Peter Ludman
  • , Mark A. De Belder
  • , James Nolan
  • , Mamas A. Mamas
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Keele
  • University Hospital of North Midlands
  • University Hospital of Wales
  • University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
  • South Cleveland Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

36 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives This study sought to examine the relationship between access site practice and clinical outcomes in patients requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following thrombolysis for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Background Transradial access (TRA) is associated with better outcomes in patients requiring PCI for STEMI. A significant proportion of STEMI patients may receive thrombolysis before undergoing PCI in many countries across the world. There are limited data around access site practice and its associated outcomes in this cohort of patients. Methods The author used the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society dataset to investigate the outcomes of patients undergoing PCI following thrombolysis between 2007 and 2014. Patients were divided into TRA and transfemoral access groups depending on the access site used. Multiple logistic regression and propensity score matching were used to study the association of access site with in-hospital and long-term mortality, major bleeding, and access site–related complications. Results A total of 10,209 patients received thrombolysis and PCI during the study time. TRA was used in 48% (n = 4,959) of patients; 3.3% (n = 336) patients died in hospital, 1.6% (n = 165) of patients experienced major bleeding, 4.2% (n = 437) experienced major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and 4.6% (n = 468) experienced 30-day mortality. After multivariate adjustment, TRA was associated with significantly reduced odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42 to 0.83; p = 0.002), major bleeding (OR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.66; p < 0.001), MACE (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.94; p = 0.01), and 30-day mortality (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.94; p = 0.01). Conclusions TRA is associated with decreased odds of bleeding complications, mortality, and MACE in patients undergoing PCI following thrombolysis and should be preferred access site choice in this cohort of patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2258-2265
Number of pages8
JournalJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume10
Issue number22
Early online date20 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • PCI
  • percutaneous coronary intervention
  • rescue PCI
  • TFA
  • thrombolysis
  • TRA
  • transfemoral access
  • transradial access

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of Access Site Practice on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following Thrombolysis for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United Kingdom: An Insight From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Dataset'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this