TY - JOUR
T1 - Implementing Multifactorial Risk Assessment with Polygenic Risk Scores for Personalized Breast Cancer Screening in the Population Setting: Challenges and Opportunities
AU - Walker, Meghan
AU - Blackmore, Kristina M.
AU - Chang, Amy
AU - Lambert-côté, Laurence
AU - Turgeon, Annie
AU - Antoniou, Antonis C.
AU - Bell, Kathleen A.
AU - Broeders, Mireille
AU - Carver, Tim
AU - Chiquette, Jocelyne
AU - Després, Philippe
AU - Easton, Douglas F.
AU - Eisen, Andrea
AU - Eloy, Laurence
AU - Evans, Gareth
AU - Fienberg, Samantha
AU - Joly, Yann
AU - Kim, Raymond
AU - Kim, Shana J
AU - Knoppers, Bartha
AU - Lofters, Aisha K.
AU - Nabi, Hermann
AU - Paquette, Jean-Sébastien
AU - Pashayan, Nora
AU - Sheppard, Amanda J.
AU - Stockley, Tracy
AU - Dorval, Michel
AU - Simard, Jacques
AU - Chiarelli, Anna M.
PY - 2024/5/31
Y1 - 2024/5/31
N2 - Risk-stratified breast screening has been proposed as a strategy to overcome the limitations of age-based screening. A prospective cohort study was undertaken within the PERSPECTIVE I&I project, which will generate the first Canadian evidence on multifactorial breast cancer risk assessment in the population setting to inform the implementation of risk-stratified screening. Recruited females aged 40–69 unaffected by breast cancer, with a previous mammogram, underwent multifactorial breast cancer risk assessment. The adoption of multifactorial risk assessment, the effectiveness of methods for collecting risk factor information and the costs of risk assessment were examined. Associations between participant characteristics and study sites, as well as data collection methods, were assessed using logistic regression; all p-values are two-sided. Of the 4246 participants recruited, 88.4% completed a risk assessment, with 79.8%, 15.7% and 4.4% estimated at average, higher than average and high risk, respectively. The total per-participant cost for risk assessment was CAD 315. Participants who chose to provide risk factor information on paper/telephone (27.2%) vs. online were more likely to be older (p = 0.021), not born in Canada (p = 0.043), visible minorities (p = 0.01) and have a lower attained education (p < 0.0001) and perceived fair/poor health (p < 0.001). The 34.4% of participants requiring risk factor verification for missing/unusual values were more likely to be visible minorities (p = 0.009) and have a lower attained education (p ≤ 0.006). This study demonstrates the feasibility of risk assessment for risk-stratified screening at the population level. Implementation should incorporate an equity lens to ensure cancer-screening disparities are not widened.
AB - Risk-stratified breast screening has been proposed as a strategy to overcome the limitations of age-based screening. A prospective cohort study was undertaken within the PERSPECTIVE I&I project, which will generate the first Canadian evidence on multifactorial breast cancer risk assessment in the population setting to inform the implementation of risk-stratified screening. Recruited females aged 40–69 unaffected by breast cancer, with a previous mammogram, underwent multifactorial breast cancer risk assessment. The adoption of multifactorial risk assessment, the effectiveness of methods for collecting risk factor information and the costs of risk assessment were examined. Associations between participant characteristics and study sites, as well as data collection methods, were assessed using logistic regression; all p-values are two-sided. Of the 4246 participants recruited, 88.4% completed a risk assessment, with 79.8%, 15.7% and 4.4% estimated at average, higher than average and high risk, respectively. The total per-participant cost for risk assessment was CAD 315. Participants who chose to provide risk factor information on paper/telephone (27.2%) vs. online were more likely to be older (p = 0.021), not born in Canada (p = 0.043), visible minorities (p = 0.01) and have a lower attained education (p < 0.0001) and perceived fair/poor health (p < 0.001). The 34.4% of participants requiring risk factor verification for missing/unusual values were more likely to be visible minorities (p = 0.009) and have a lower attained education (p ≤ 0.006). This study demonstrates the feasibility of risk assessment for risk-stratified screening at the population level. Implementation should incorporate an equity lens to ensure cancer-screening disparities are not widened.
KW - breast cancer
KW - breast cancer screening
KW - implementation
KW - polygenic risk score
KW - risk assessment
KW - risk stratification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85195786302&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/cancers16112116
DO - 10.3390/cancers16112116
M3 - Article
C2 - 38893236
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 16
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 11
M1 - 2116
ER -