Improving child compliance on a computer-administered nonword repetition task

Kamila Polišenská, Svetlana Kapalková

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Purpose: A range of nonword repetition (NWR) tasks are used in research and clinical applications, but compliance rates among young children remain low. Live presentation is usually used to improve compliance rates, but this lacks the consistency of recorded stimuli. In this study, the authors examined whether a novel delivery of NWR stimuli based on recorded material could provide improved compliance rates in young children, thereby reducing research bias. Method: The novel NWR task with 26 recorded items was administered to 391 typically developing children ages 2-6 years. The children were presented with a story that they could influence by repeating "magic" words. The task was administered via computer with animation. Results: From the 384 children who completed the task, the authors found a noncompliance rate related to age. In line with previous research, no effect of demographic factors was found, but there was a significant main effect of age, syllable length, and phonological complexity on repetition accuracy. Test- retest and interrater scoring showed high levels of reliability. Conclusion: The task described in this study offers an objective delivery of recorded stimuli that engages young children and provides high compliance rates. The task is inexpensive, requires minimal training, and can be adapted to other languages. © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1060-1068
    Number of pages8
    JournalJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
    Volume57
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Keywords

    • Assessment
    • Children
    • Phonology
    • Screening

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Improving child compliance on a computer-administered nonword repetition task'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this