Incertitude induced by testing a small number of catalytic pellets in fixed beds

Matthieu Rolland, Claudio P. Fonte

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Heterogeneous catalyst pellets evaluation is performed in smaller and smaller reactors with the main objective of reducing catalyst development costs. Downscaling raises the question: is there a lower limit to the number of pellets that ought to be tested in a reactor so that the results do not depend on which pellets are sampled? Major sources of variability among a catalyst pellet population are dimensions and many parameters that can be grouped as "intrinsic kinetic activity" (porosity, tortuosity, active phase repartition and availability).In this paper, we present a methodology to estimate the incertitude induced by variability on size and kinetics on the evaluation of the apparent kinetic constant in a fixed bed reactor. Analytical expressions are presented to predict this incertitude for sphere and cylinder shaped pellets, with a first order kinetic law in two limiting cases: the absence of mass transfer limitations and presence of severe internal mass transfer limitations. The predicted incertitude scales as the square root of sample population: downsizing increases the incertitude. We propose criteria to evaluate the minimum number of pellets to sample, so that sampling induced variability is lower than an acceptable incertitude, expressed in °C. This acceptable incertitude could be for example a fraction of the experimental temperature incertitude.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)698-705
    Number of pages8
    JournalChemical Engineering Science
    Volume138
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Keywords

    • Catalyst testing
    • Criteria
    • Downscaling
    • Fixed beds
    • Incertitude
    • Sampling

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Incertitude induced by testing a small number of catalytic pellets in fixed beds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this