TY - JOUR
T1 - Incidental extra-cardiac findings on clinical CMR
AU - Irwin, Richard Bruce
AU - Newton, Tom
AU - Peebles, Charles
AU - Borg, Alexander
AU - Clark, David
AU - Miller, Christopher
AU - Abidin, Nik
AU - Greaves, Melanie
AU - Schmitt, Matthias
PY - 2013/2
Y1 - 2013/2
N2 - AimsCardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging benefits from a large field of view, but consequently captures incidental extra-cardiac findings (IEFs). There is a relative paucity of data for CMR in this regard. Our objectives were to assess the frequency and significance of IEFs reported from clinically indicated CMR scans, and additionally to ascertain if reporting rates differed between radiologist and cardiologist in a 'real-world' setting.Methods and resultsA total of 714 patients were included for the study. All patients were referred to a single tertiary cardiac unit for clinically indicated scans. The clinical reports were retrospectively reviewed for reported IEF, and classified as 'minor', or 'major' depending on the need of further investigation or clinical correlation. A total of 180 IEFs were reported in 154 (21.6%) patients. Ninety IEFs were considered minor, and 90 major. Of the latter, eight (1.1%) were considered highly significant. Two hundred scans were reported by a consultant radiologist, and 514 by cardiologists. There was no significant difference in the rates of IEF reporting between the two specialties (P = 0.38).ConclusionIEFs are common, requiring further investigation in a substantial minority. The incidence of highly significant findings in this study was low (∼1%), and similar to the reported incidence in the computed tomography literature. No significant difference was found between the reporting rates of IEFs between different specialties. © The Author 2012.
AB - AimsCardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging benefits from a large field of view, but consequently captures incidental extra-cardiac findings (IEFs). There is a relative paucity of data for CMR in this regard. Our objectives were to assess the frequency and significance of IEFs reported from clinically indicated CMR scans, and additionally to ascertain if reporting rates differed between radiologist and cardiologist in a 'real-world' setting.Methods and resultsA total of 714 patients were included for the study. All patients were referred to a single tertiary cardiac unit for clinically indicated scans. The clinical reports were retrospectively reviewed for reported IEF, and classified as 'minor', or 'major' depending on the need of further investigation or clinical correlation. A total of 180 IEFs were reported in 154 (21.6%) patients. Ninety IEFs were considered minor, and 90 major. Of the latter, eight (1.1%) were considered highly significant. Two hundred scans were reported by a consultant radiologist, and 514 by cardiologists. There was no significant difference in the rates of IEF reporting between the two specialties (P = 0.38).ConclusionIEFs are common, requiring further investigation in a substantial minority. The incidence of highly significant findings in this study was low (∼1%), and similar to the reported incidence in the computed tomography literature. No significant difference was found between the reporting rates of IEFs between different specialties. © The Author 2012.
KW - Cardiac magnetic resonance
KW - Incidental extra-cardiac findings
U2 - 10.1093/ehjci/jes133
DO - 10.1093/ehjci/jes133
M3 - Article
C2 - 22771783
SN - 2047-2404
VL - 14
SP - 158
EP - 166
JO - European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging
JF - European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging
IS - 2
ER -