TY - JOUR
T1 - Increasing the accuracy of peanut allergy diagnosis by using Ara h 2.
AU - Dang, Thanh D
AU - Tang, Mimi
AU - Choo, Sharon
AU - Licciardi, Paul V
AU - Koplin, Jennifer J
AU - Martin, Pamela E
AU - Tan, Tina
AU - Gurrin, Lyle C
AU - Ponsonby, Anne-Louise
AU - Tey, Dean
AU - Robinson, Marnie
AU - Dharmage, Shyamali C
AU - Allen, Katrina J
A2 - Wake, Melissa
A2 - Matheson, Melanie
A2 - Lowe, Adrian
A2 - Osborne, Nick
A2 - Hill, David
A2 - Miles, Lucy
A2 - Anderson, Deborah
A2 - Sanjeevan, Jeeva
A2 - Zurzolo, John
A2 - Czech, Helen
A2 - Thiele, Leone
PY - 2012/4
Y1 - 2012/4
N2 - BACKGROUND: Measurement of whole peanut-specific IgE (sIgE) is often used to confirm sensitization but does not reliably predict allergy. Ara h 2 is the dominant peanut allergen detected in 90% to 100% of patients with peanut allergy and could help improve diagnosis. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether Ara h 2 testing might improve the accuracy of diagnosing peanut allergy and therefore circumvent the need for an oral food challenge (OFC). METHODS: Infants from the population-based HealthNuts study underwent skin prick tests to determine peanut sensitization and subsequently underwent a peanut OFC to confirm allergy status. In a stratified random sample of 200 infants (100 with peanut allergy and 100 with peanut tolerance), whole peanut sIgE and Ara h 2 sIgE levels were quantified by using fluorescence enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: By using the previously published 95% positive predictive value of 15 kU(A)/L for whole peanut sIgE, a corresponding specificity of 98% (95% CI, 93% to 100%) was found in this study cohort. At the equivalent specificity of 98%, the sensitivity of Ara h 2 sIgE is 60% (95% CI, 50% to 70%), correctly identifying 60% of subjects with true peanut allergy compared with only 26% correctly identified by using whole peanut sIgE. We report that when using a combined approach of plasma sIgE testing for whole peanut followed by Ara h 2 for the diagnosis of peanut allergy, the number of OFCs required is reduced by almost two thirds. CONCLUSION: Ara h 2 plasma sIgE test levels provide higher diagnostic accuracy than whole peanut plasma sIgE levels and could be considered a new diagnostic tool to distinguish peanut allergy from peanut tolerance, which might reduce the need for an OFC.
AB - BACKGROUND: Measurement of whole peanut-specific IgE (sIgE) is often used to confirm sensitization but does not reliably predict allergy. Ara h 2 is the dominant peanut allergen detected in 90% to 100% of patients with peanut allergy and could help improve diagnosis. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether Ara h 2 testing might improve the accuracy of diagnosing peanut allergy and therefore circumvent the need for an oral food challenge (OFC). METHODS: Infants from the population-based HealthNuts study underwent skin prick tests to determine peanut sensitization and subsequently underwent a peanut OFC to confirm allergy status. In a stratified random sample of 200 infants (100 with peanut allergy and 100 with peanut tolerance), whole peanut sIgE and Ara h 2 sIgE levels were quantified by using fluorescence enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: By using the previously published 95% positive predictive value of 15 kU(A)/L for whole peanut sIgE, a corresponding specificity of 98% (95% CI, 93% to 100%) was found in this study cohort. At the equivalent specificity of 98%, the sensitivity of Ara h 2 sIgE is 60% (95% CI, 50% to 70%), correctly identifying 60% of subjects with true peanut allergy compared with only 26% correctly identified by using whole peanut sIgE. We report that when using a combined approach of plasma sIgE testing for whole peanut followed by Ara h 2 for the diagnosis of peanut allergy, the number of OFCs required is reduced by almost two thirds. CONCLUSION: Ara h 2 plasma sIgE test levels provide higher diagnostic accuracy than whole peanut plasma sIgE levels and could be considered a new diagnostic tool to distinguish peanut allergy from peanut tolerance, which might reduce the need for an OFC.
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.01.056
DO - 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.01.056
M3 - Article
C2 - 22385632
SN - 1097-6825
VL - 129
JO - The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology
JF - The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology
IS - 4
ER -