Individual differences in metacognitive knowledge contribute to psychological vulnerability more than the presence of a mental disorder does

Henrik Nordahl, Adrian Wells

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

44 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Psychological vulnerability can be operationalized as trait-anxiety, the stable tendency to experience anxiety and negative affect when exposed to stress. The current study set out to test whether metacognitive beliefs could be an underlying factor explaining variance in trait-anxiety when the presence of psychopathology is controlled. Participants reported mental health status and completed self-report measures. Our findings showed that multiple domains of metacognitive beliefs accounted for an additional 44.9 per cent of the variance in trait anxiety after the presence of diagnosed psychopathology was controlled. The implication of this finding is that the metacognitive model may advance conceptualization of trait anxiety and provide effective interventions for modifying psychological vulnerabilities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-20
Number of pages4
JournalMental Health and Prevention
Volume7
Early online date22 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Mental health
  • Metacognition
  • Metacognitive beliefs
  • Prevention
  • Psychological vulnerability
  • Trait-anxiety

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Individual differences in metacognitive knowledge contribute to psychological vulnerability more than the presence of a mental disorder does'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this