Infinite Magnitudes, Infinite Multitudes, and the Beginning of the Universe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

W.L. Craig has argued that the universe has a beginning because (1) the infinitude of the past entails the existence of actual infinite multitudes of past intervals of time, and (2) the existence of actual infinite multitudes is impossible. Puryear has rejected (1) and argued that what the infinitude of the past entails is only the existence of an actual infinite magnitude of past time. But this does not preclude the infinitude of the past, Puryear claims, because there can be no justification for the claim that actual infinite magnitudes are impossible. I argue, against Puryear, that there can be such a justification. I claim, nevertheless, that, for reasons entirely different from Puryear’s, the finitude of the past cannot be established based either on the impossibility of actual infinite multitudes or on the impossibility of actual infinite magnitudes. My arguments in this paper draw on insights from al-Kindī and Avicenna.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)472-489
Number of pages18
JournalAustralasian Journal of Philosophy
Volume99
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Aug 2020

Keywords

  • Avicenna
  • al-Kindī
  • infinite magnitudes
  • infinite multitudes
  • infinity
  • the beginning of the universe

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Infinite Magnitudes, Infinite Multitudes, and the Beginning of the Universe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this