TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of nickel stress on growth and some important physiological/biochemical attributes in some diverse canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars
AU - Ali, M. A.
AU - Ashraf, M.
AU - Athar, H. R.
N1 - 03043894 (ISSN) Cited By (since 1996): 9 Export Date: 27 March 2012 Source: Scopus CODEN: JHMAD doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.077 PubMed ID: 19699032 Language of Original Document: English Correspondence Address: Ali, M.A.; Department of Botany, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38040, Pakistan; email: [email protected] Chemicals/CAS: cysteine, 4371-52-2, 52-89-1, 52-90-4; histidine, 645-35-2, 7006-35-1, 71-00-1; nickel, 7440-02-0; serine, 56-45-1, 6898-95-9; Cysteine, 52-90-4; Histidine, 71-00-1; Nickel, 7440-02-0; Serine, 56-45-1; Water, 7732-18-5 References: Seregin, I.V., Kozhevnikova, A.D., Physiological role of nickel and its toxic effects on higher plants (2006) Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 53, pp. 257-277; Gajewska, E., Staba, M., Andrzejewska, R., Sklodowska, M., Nickel-induced inhibition of wheat root growth is related to H2O2 production, but not to lipid peroxidation (2006) Plant Growth Regul., 49, pp. 95-103; Jozef, K., Borivoj, K., Jana, K., Martin, B., Physiology of Matricaria chamomilla exposed to nickel excess (2009) Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety, 72, pp. 603-609; Ma, Y., Rajkumar, M., Freitas, H., Improvement of plant growth and nickel uptake by nickel resistant plant growth promoting bacteria (2009) J. Hazard Mater., 166, pp. 1154-1161; Clemens, S., Molecular mechanisms of plant metal tolerance and homeostasis (2001) Planta, 212, pp. 475-486; Hall, J.L., Cellular mechanisms for heavy metal detoxification and tolerance (2002) J. Exp. Bot., 53, pp. 1-11; Shah, K., Dubey, R.S., Effect of cadmium on proline accumulation and ribonuclease activity in rice seedlings: role of proline as a possible enzyme protectant (2002) Biol. Plant., 40, pp. 121-130; Gratao, P.L., Monteiro, C.C., Antunes, A.M., Peres, L.E.P., Azevedo, R.A., Acquired tolerance of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Micro-Tom) plants to cadmium-induced stress (2008) Ann. Appl. Biol., 153, pp. 321-333; Escarré, J., Lefèbvre, C., Gruber, W., Zinc and cadmium hyper accumulation by Thlaspi caerulescens from metalliferous and nonmetalliferous sites in the Mediterranean area: implications for phytoremediation (2000) New Phytol., 149, pp. 61-69; Vacchina, V., Mari, S., Czernic, F., Speciation of nickel in a hyper accumulating plant by high-performance liquid chromotography-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and electrospray MS/MS assisted by cloning using yeast complementation (2003) Anal. Chem., 75, pp. 2740-2745; Roosens, N., Verbruggen, N., Meerts, P., Natural variation in cadmium tolerance and its relationship to metal hyperaccumulation for seven populations of Thlaspi caerulescens from Western Europe (2003) New Phytol., 26, pp. 1657-1672; Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L., Protein measurement with Folin phenol reagent (1951) J. Biol. Chem., 193, pp. 265-275; Hamilton, P.B., Van Slyke, D.D., Amino acid determination with ninhydrin (1943) J. Biol. Chem., 150, pp. 231-233; Malik, C.P., Srivastava, A.K., (1985) Text Book of Plant Physiology, , Kalyani Publisher, New Delhi, India; Braithwaite, A., Smith, F.J., (1985) Chromatographic Methods. 4th ed., , Chapman and Hall Ltd, New York; Allen, S.E., Grimshaw, H.M., Rowland, A.P., Chemical analysis (1986) Methods in Plant Ecology. 2nd ed., pp. 285-344. , Moore P.D., and Chapman S.B. (Eds), Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford; Wolf, B., A comprehensive system of leaf analysis and its use for diagnosing crop nutrient status (1982) Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 13, pp. 1035-1059; Snedecor, G.W., Cochran, W.G., (1986) Statistical Methods. 7th ed., , University Press, Ames, The Iowa State; Malan, H., Farrant, J.M., Effects of the metal pollutants cadmium and nickel on soybean seed development (1998) Seed Sci. Res., 8, pp. 445-453; Kochian, L.V., Pence, N.S., Letham, D.L.D., Mechanisms of metal resistance in plants: aluminum and heavy metals (2002) Plant Soil, 247, pp. 109-119; Kramer, P.J., Boyer, J.S., (1995) Water relations of Plants and Soils, , Academic Press, San Diego, USA; Baker, A.J.M., Walker, P.L., Ecophysiology of metal uptake by tolerant plants (1989) Heavy Metal Tolerance in Plants: Evolutionary Aspects, pp. 155-177. , Shaw A.J. (Ed), CRC Press, Boca Baton, FL, USA; Ashraf, M., Harris, P.J.C., Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants (2004) Plant Sci., 166, pp. 3-16; Sinha, S., Pandey, K., Nickel induced toxic effects and bioaccumulation in the submerged plant, Hydrilla verticillata (l.f.) Royle under repeated metal exposure: its removal (2003) Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 71, pp. 1175-1183; Krämer, U., Cotter-Howells, J.D., Charnock, J.M., Free histidine as a metal chelator in plants that accumulate nickel (1996) Nature, 379, pp. 635-638; Smith, R.M., Martell, A.E., (1989) Stability Constants, 6. , Plenum Press, New York second supplement; Freeman, J.L., Persans, M.W., Nieman, K., Increased glutathione biosynthesis plays a role in nickel tolerance in Thlaspi nickel hyperaccumulators (2004) Plant Cell, 16, pp. 2176-2191
PY - 2009/12/30
Y1 - 2009/12/30
N2 - To assess the effect of nickel on six canola cultivars a series of experiments were conducted. On the basis of shoot dry weight cvs. Shiralee and Range found to be nickel tolerant, Dunkeld and Ester as nickel sensitive, while the remaining cultivars intermediate. Nickel accumulation in shoots was lower in the nickel sensitive cultivars followed by that in the tolerant ones. Leaf water and osmotic potentials decreased significantly due to high concentration of Ni 2+. Decrease in osmotic potential was positively associated with accumulation of total free amino acids. By comparing accumulation of individual amino acids, pattern of accumulation of the amino acids was different in different cultivars. However, only histidine, serine and cysteine increased in appreciable amount in the xylem sap of different canola cultivars. Overall, nickel tolerant cultivars Shiralee and Range showed higher levels of histidine, serine and cysteine under varying levels of nickel than the others. This higher accumulation of histidine, serine and cysteine was positively related to nickel tolerance in all canola cultivars. Thus, differential nickel tolerance in canola cultivars proposed to be associated with relative detoxification of Ni by developing complexes with histidine, serine and cysteine and can be used as potential indicators of nickel tolerance in canola. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
AB - To assess the effect of nickel on six canola cultivars a series of experiments were conducted. On the basis of shoot dry weight cvs. Shiralee and Range found to be nickel tolerant, Dunkeld and Ester as nickel sensitive, while the remaining cultivars intermediate. Nickel accumulation in shoots was lower in the nickel sensitive cultivars followed by that in the tolerant ones. Leaf water and osmotic potentials decreased significantly due to high concentration of Ni 2+. Decrease in osmotic potential was positively associated with accumulation of total free amino acids. By comparing accumulation of individual amino acids, pattern of accumulation of the amino acids was different in different cultivars. However, only histidine, serine and cysteine increased in appreciable amount in the xylem sap of different canola cultivars. Overall, nickel tolerant cultivars Shiralee and Range showed higher levels of histidine, serine and cysteine under varying levels of nickel than the others. This higher accumulation of histidine, serine and cysteine was positively related to nickel tolerance in all canola cultivars. Thus, differential nickel tolerance in canola cultivars proposed to be associated with relative detoxification of Ni by developing complexes with histidine, serine and cysteine and can be used as potential indicators of nickel tolerance in canola. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
KW - Amino acids
KW - Brassica napus L.
KW - Ni accumulation
KW - Osmotic potential
KW - Soluble proteins
KW - Soluble sugars
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.077
DO - 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.077
M3 - Article
SN - 0304-3894
VL - 172
SP - 964
EP - 969
JO - Journal of Hazardous Materials
JF - Journal of Hazardous Materials
IS - 2-3
ER -