Institutional Change and Innovation System Transformation: A Tale of Two Academies

Maria Karaulova, Oliver Shackleton, Weishu Liu, Abdullah Gӧk, Philip Shapira

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


This paper investigates interactions between institutional adaptation and the transformation of science and innovation systems by analysing change and adjustment in post-socialist science academies. Two leading examples are examined: the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS). A heuristic framework of institutional change markers is applied to the analysis of nanotechnology research in both countries. We draw on bibliometric sources, interviews and secondary sources. We find that while the two Academies share a common past as the dominant research agents in their respective systems, their current positions and trajectories now differ. The nanotechnology case shows that CAS has adapted to China’s modernisation, engaged in central government policy initiatives, and interacted with other research performers. CAS remains central to the Chinese research system, and has rejuvenated and expanded its resource base. RAS, on the contrary, has taken a protectionist stance: it still dominates the Russian research system and has a strong nanotechnology position, enforced by its gatekeeper control over journal publication. Nevertheless, RAS has faced difficulties in internal modernisation, leading to the external imposition of reforms and further role diminishment. The paper offers comparative insights into processes of institutional adaptation and highlights how key institutions can influence system transition.
Original languageEnglish
JournalTechnological Forecasting and Social Change
Early online date13 Nov 2016
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2017


  • Research system transition; Institutional change; China; Russia; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Russian Academy of Sciences

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Manchester Institute of Innovation Research


Dive into the research topics of 'Institutional Change and Innovation System Transformation: A Tale of Two Academies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this