TY - JOUR
T1 - Inter and intra observer variability in a semi-automatic method for measuring volumetric breast density
AU - Verow, Rosanne
AU - Berks, Michael
AU - Diffey, Jennifer
AU - Chung, Camilla
AU - Morrison, Joanna
AU - Wilson, Mary
AU - Boggis, Caroline
AU - Barr, Nicky
AU - Morris, Julie
AU - Hufton, Alan
AU - Astley, Susan
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - If breast density is to be incorporated into breast cancer risk prediction models, the technique used for measurement must be quantitative, accurate, objective and reproducible. We present a semi-automated method that has been used by three independent operators to measure glandular volume from the digitised mammograms of 29 women (116 images). Additionally, one operator used the method on 10 separate occasions on a sample of 24 images. Intra-observer variability was found to be acceptably low, with coefficients of variation ranging from 3.5 - 5.7% depending on mammographic view (intra-class correlation coefficient close to 1 in all cases). However, inter-observer variability was greater with significant differences in glandular volume recorded between observers. This was attributed to the method of breast edge detection. The development of a new automatic breast edge detection algorithm has resolved the issue. The average difference in glandular volume measurement between two independent operators in the cranio-caudal view is -0.89cm3 (95% confidence interval -2.77 - 0.99 cm3) using the new method, compared to 5.99cm3 (95% confidence interval 2.72 - 9.76 cm3) using the old method. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.
AB - If breast density is to be incorporated into breast cancer risk prediction models, the technique used for measurement must be quantitative, accurate, objective and reproducible. We present a semi-automated method that has been used by three independent operators to measure glandular volume from the digitised mammograms of 29 women (116 images). Additionally, one operator used the method on 10 separate occasions on a sample of 24 images. Intra-observer variability was found to be acceptably low, with coefficients of variation ranging from 3.5 - 5.7% depending on mammographic view (intra-class correlation coefficient close to 1 in all cases). However, inter-observer variability was greater with significant differences in glandular volume recorded between observers. This was attributed to the method of breast edge detection. The development of a new automatic breast edge detection algorithm has resolved the issue. The average difference in glandular volume measurement between two independent operators in the cranio-caudal view is -0.89cm3 (95% confidence interval -2.77 - 0.99 cm3) using the new method, compared to 5.99cm3 (95% confidence interval 2.72 - 9.76 cm3) using the old method. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.
KW - breast density
KW - observer variability
KW - volumetric technique
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_78
DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_78
M3 - Article
SN - 0302-9743
VL - 6136
SP - 576
EP - 582
JO - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
JF - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
ER -