International relations in the post-globalisation era

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article addresses the question of whether the traditional conceptual problematics that have defined the discipline of international relations (IR) are adequate to the contemporary global order. I propose that the sterile choice between the theoretical tropes of statism and globalisation which has defined recent IR scholarship prevents getting to grips with the 'post-globalisation' nature of phenomena such as al-Qa'eda terrorism and the war on terror launched in response. In this light it is necessary to ask whether the state of the art in IR needs critical re-evaluation. I examine the conceptual problematics that delineate IR as a distinct intellectual terrain. These are identified as the problems of morphology, governance and violence in the global order. I then outline the orthodox, statist resolution of these problematics. The inadequacy of such a resolution is noted and an outline proposal for recasting the discipline of IR is advanced. I conclude by noting that while the conceptual tropes historically deployed to understand global politics might be inadequate, it is not necessary to discard IR as a distinct intellectual terrain. Rather a revivification of this terrain beyond statism and globalism is required.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-61
Number of pages8
JournalPolitics
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2006

Keywords

  • globalization
  • international relations
  • terrorism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International relations in the post-globalisation era'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this