Abstract
This paper responds to a recent criticism of Uebel's analysis of Neurath's protocol statements and proposes some independent amendments. © 2007 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 383-391 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Journal for General Philosophy of Science |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2007 |
Keywords
- Conditions of scientific testimony acceptance
- Empiricism
- Evidence statements
- Logical empiricism
- Otto Neurath
- Protocol sentences