Interpreting Ricardo: A further reply to Sraffians

Terry Peach

doi:10.1093/cje/26.3.381

Interpreting Ricardo: A further reply to Sraffians

Terry Peach

Economics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The paper contains a further defence of those aspects of the interpretation of Ricardo advanced in Peach (1993) that have been subjected to criticism by writers of a Sraffian persuasion. It is argued that the latest criticisms, from Heinz Kurz and Gary Mongiovi, serve best to illuminate the problems with the Sraffa-derived view of Ricardo.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	381-391
Number of pages	10
Journal	Cambridge Journal of Economics
Volume	26
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/26.3.381
Publication status	Published - 2002

Keywords

Classical political economy
Ricardo
Sraffa

Access to Document

10.1093/cje/26.3.381

Cite this

@article{eff6c1ccf79a4156b145934e5abd4db1,

title = "Interpreting Ricardo: A further reply to Sraffians",

abstract = "The paper contains a further defence of those aspects of the interpretation of Ricardo advanced in Peach (1993) that have been subjected to criticism by writers of a Sraffian persuasion. It is argued that the latest criticisms, from Heinz Kurz and Gary Mongiovi, serve best to illuminate the problems with the Sraffa-derived view of Ricardo.",

keywords = "Classical political economy, Ricardo, Sraffa",

author = "Terry Peach",

year = "2002",

doi = "10.1093/cje/26.3.381",

language = "English",

volume = "26",

pages = "381--391",

journal = "Cambridge Journal of Economics",

issn = "1464-3545",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interpreting Ricardo: A further reply to Sraffians

AU - Peach, Terry

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - The paper contains a further defence of those aspects of the interpretation of Ricardo advanced in Peach (1993) that have been subjected to criticism by writers of a Sraffian persuasion. It is argued that the latest criticisms, from Heinz Kurz and Gary Mongiovi, serve best to illuminate the problems with the Sraffa-derived view of Ricardo.

AB - The paper contains a further defence of those aspects of the interpretation of Ricardo advanced in Peach (1993) that have been subjected to criticism by writers of a Sraffian persuasion. It is argued that the latest criticisms, from Heinz Kurz and Gary Mongiovi, serve best to illuminate the problems with the Sraffa-derived view of Ricardo.

KW - Classical political economy

KW - Ricardo

KW - Sraffa

U2 - 10.1093/cje/26.3.381

DO - 10.1093/cje/26.3.381

M3 - Article

SN - 1464-3545

VL - 26

SP - 381

EP - 391

JO - Cambridge Journal of Economics

JF - Cambridge Journal of Economics

IS - 3

ER -

Interpreting Ricardo: A further reply to Sraffians

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this