TY - JOUR
T1 - Intersubjective Accountability
T2 - Politics and Philosophy in the Left Vienna Circle
AU - Uebel, Thomas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by The Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/2/10
Y1 - 2020/2/10
N2 - In different places Rudolf Carnap and Otto Neurath affirmed “a noteworthy agreement” and an “inner link” between their philosophy of science and political movements agitating for radical socio-economic change. Given the normative abstinence of Vienna Circle philosophy, indeed the metaethical commitments of its verificationism, this claim presents a major interpretive challenge that is only heightened when Neurath’s engagement for the socialization of national economies is taken into account. It is argued here that Carnap’s and Neurath’s positions are saved from inconsistency once some careful distinctions are understood and it is recognized that they, together with the other members of the Circle, adhered to an epistemic norm here called “intersubjective accountability.”
AB - In different places Rudolf Carnap and Otto Neurath affirmed “a noteworthy agreement” and an “inner link” between their philosophy of science and political movements agitating for radical socio-economic change. Given the normative abstinence of Vienna Circle philosophy, indeed the metaethical commitments of its verificationism, this claim presents a major interpretive challenge that is only heightened when Neurath’s engagement for the socialization of national economies is taken into account. It is argued here that Carnap’s and Neurath’s positions are saved from inconsistency once some careful distinctions are understood and it is recognized that they, together with the other members of the Circle, adhered to an epistemic norm here called “intersubjective accountability.”
U2 - 10.1162/posc_a_00332
DO - 10.1162/posc_a_00332
M3 - Article
SN - 1063-6145
VL - 28
SP - 35
EP - 62
JO - Perspectives on Science
JF - Perspectives on Science
IS - 1
ER -