Intimate yet dysfunctional? The relationship between governance and conflict resolution in India and the European Union

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The rise of India and the EU as global actors has sparked growing interest in their peace-building approaches. This paper compares the objectives and effects of the EU's and India's engagement in different conflict contexts within and alongside their borders. It examines whether their practices of conflict resolution or peace-building strive for more than conflict management or 'governmentality'. This article asks whether there is sufficient consistency across either actors' governance interventions to even speak of a distinct 'strategy' or 'governance culture'. It illustrates the close relationship between governance and conflict response initiatives but finds that the relationship is often dysfunctional. © 2013 © 2013 King's College, London.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-59
Number of pages26
JournalConflict, Security and Development
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Humanitarian and Conflict Response Institute

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intimate yet dysfunctional? The relationship between governance and conflict resolution in India and the European Union'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this