Intuition Fail: Philosophical Activity and the Limits of Expertise

Wesley Buckwalter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

153 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Experimental philosophers have empirically challenged the connection between intuition and philosophical expertise. This paper reviews these challenges alongside other research findings in cognitive science on expert performance and argues for three claims. First, evidence taken to challenge philosophical expertise may also be explained by the well‐researched failures and limitations of genuine expertise. Second, studying the failures and limitations of experts across many fields provides a promising research program upon which to base a new model of philosophical expertise. Third, a model of philosophical expertise based on the limitations of genuine experts may suggest a series of constraints on the reliability of professional philosophical intuition.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)378-410
JournalPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research
Volume92
Early online date14 Oct 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intuition Fail: Philosophical Activity and the Limits of Expertise'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this