Abstract
The word ‘intuition’ is used frequently both in philosophy and in discussions about philosophical methods. It has been argued that this intuition-talk makes no (clear) semantic contribution and that intuition-talk is thus a bad habit that ought to be abandoned. I urge caution in making this inference. There are many pragmatic roles intuition-talk might play. Moreover, according to one plausible story (for which there is some empirical support), there is reason to think intuition-talk is actually a good habit for philosophers to have.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 523-531 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Philosophia |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 22 Jan 2017 |
Keywords
- Philosophy
- Metaphilosophy
- Intuitions
- Philosophical Methodology
- Linguistics
- English for academic purposes,
- Hedges
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Intuition-Talk: Virus or Virtue?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.-
Intuitions about cases as evidence (for how we should think)
Andow, J., 3 Jul 2023, In: Inquiry. 66, 6, p. 1036-1068 33 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile81 Downloads (Pure) -
English Language and Philosophy
Tallant, J. & Andow, J., 5 May 2020, The Routledge Handbook of English Language and Digital Humanities. S. A. & D. K. (eds.).Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review
File204 Downloads (Pure) -
How distinctive is philosophers’ intuition talk?
Andow, J., 13 Nov 2015, In: Metaphilosophy. 46, 4-5, p. 515-538 24 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open Access
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver