Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Intuition-Talk: Virus or Virtue?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The word ‘intuition’ is used frequently both in philosophy and in discussions about philosophical methods. It has been argued that this intuition-talk makes no (clear) semantic contribution and that intuition-talk is thus a bad habit that ought to be abandoned. I urge caution in making this inference. There are many pragmatic roles intuition-talk might play. Moreover, according to one plausible story (for which there is some empirical support), there is reason to think intuition-talk is actually a good habit for philosophers to have.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)523-531
Number of pages9
JournalPhilosophia
Volume45
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jan 2017

Keywords

  • Philosophy
  • Metaphilosophy
  • Intuitions
  • Philosophical Methodology
  • Linguistics
  • English for academic purposes,
  • Hedges

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intuition-Talk: Virus or Virtue?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • Intuitions about cases as evidence (for how we should think)

    Andow, J., 3 Jul 2023, In: Inquiry. 66, 6, p. 1036-1068 33 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Open Access
    File
    81 Downloads (Pure)
  • English Language and Philosophy

    Tallant, J. & Andow, J., 5 May 2020, The Routledge Handbook of English Language and Digital Humanities. S. A. & D. K. (eds.).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    File
    204 Downloads (Pure)
  • How distinctive is philosophers’ intuition talk?

    Andow, J., 13 Nov 2015, In: Metaphilosophy. 46, 4-5, p. 515-538 24 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Open Access

Cite this