Involving an individual with lived experience in a co-analysis of qualitative data

Laura Hemming, Daniel Pratt, Peer Bhatti, Jennifer Shaw, Gillian Haddock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: People with lived experience of the phenomenon under investigation are seldom involved in the analysis of qualitative data, and there exists little guidance for those wishing to involve contributors at this stage of research.
Aims: To critically reflect on the process of involving people with lived experience in a thematic analysis and to offer direction to other researchers.
Methods: An individual with lived experience of residing in prison contributed to a co-analysis of qualitative data using thematic analysis. This paper reports on involvement at each stage of a thematic analysis and follows an established reporting checklist.
Results: A number of challenges and benefits were encountered in the process of co-analysing the data. These are discussed in relation to previous research and how to overcome the challenges encountered.
Conclusions: The paper concludes by giving recommendations and guidance for future researchers wishing to involve people with lived experience in qualitative data analysis.
Patient or public contribution: An individual with lived experience of being detained in prison was involved in designing this study, co-analysing the data and preparing the manuscript for submission.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)766-775
JournalHealth Expectations
Volume24
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2021

Keywords

  • Patient and public involvement
  • forensic
  • qualitative
  • thematic analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Involving an individual with lived experience in a co-analysis of qualitative data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this