Is adenotonsillar hypertrophy associated with dentofacial morphology? A systematic review and meta-analyses

Tingting Zhao, Min Wang, Peter Ngan, Zhendong Tao, Xueqian Yu, Fang Hua*, Hong He*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction
As a common cause of upper airway obstruction in children, adenotonsillar hypertrophy (ATH) has been hypothesized to adversely affect dentofacial development and morphology. This systematic review aimed to summarize the existing evidence regarding the association between ATH and dentofacial characteristics of children.

Methods
Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and VIP Chinese Journal Database) were searched from inception to November 1, 2024, for cross-sectional studies that compared the dental or craniofacial characteristics of children with and without adenoid hypertrophy (AH) and/or tonsillar hypertrophy (TH). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for Cross-Sectional Studies was used to assess the methodologic quality of included studies. Meta-analyses were performed with the random-effects model.

Results
Thirty-six studies were included in this review. According to meta-analyses, the mandibular plane angle (SN-MP: mean difference [MD] = 2.20° [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.47-2.92]; P <0.00001), articular angle (ArGoMe: MD, 1.23° [95% CI, 0.68-1.79]; P <0.0001) were significantly greater in children with AH and/or TH. No significant differences were found between the ANB angle between the 2 groups (MD, 0.31° [95% CI, −0.35 to 0.61]; P = 0.59). However, the SNA (MD, −0.30° [95% CI, −0.53 to −0.06]; P = 0.01) and SNB angle (MD, −0.78° [95% CI, −1.33 to −0.24]; P = 0.005) were found to be significantly smaller in children with AH and/or TH. Regarding dental characteristics, the rate of Angle Class II and III malocclusions (relative risk = 1.29 [95% CI, 1.14-1.45]; P <0.0001) and open bite (relative risk = 1.65 [95% CI, 1.21-2.25]; P = 0.001) were found to be higher in the AH and/or TH children. In addition, the width between the maxillary first molars (MD, −1.34 mm [95% CI, −2.12 to −0.56]; P = 0.0008) was found to be smaller both in AH and TH children.

Conclusions
On the basis of evidence of low to very low certainty, children with ATH tend to exhibit craniofacial characteristics such as sagittal maxillary and mandibular retrognathia and an increased mandibular plane angle. In addition, children with ATH children appear to have a higher prevalence of Class II and III malocclusions, open bite, and a narrower maxillary arch width compared with their non-ATH counterparts. However, these findings must be interpreted with caution because of the limited quality and consistency of the available evidence. The statistically significant differences identified in this review are relatively small when compared with population deviations, raising questions about their clinical significance. Further high-quality studies with standardized methodologies are needed to confirm these associations and clarify their clinical relevance.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Early online date23 Jul 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Jul 2025

Keywords

  • children
  • adenotonsillar hypertrophy
  • upper airway obstruction
  • dentofacial morphology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is adenotonsillar hypertrophy associated with dentofacial morphology? A systematic review and meta-analyses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this