Is early class III protraction facemask treatment effective?Amulticentre, randomized, controlled trial: 3-Year follow-up

Nicky Anne Mandall, Richard Cousley, Andrew DiBiase, Fiona Dyer, Simon Littlewood, Rye Mattick, Spencer Nute, Barbara Doherty, Nadia Stivaros, Ross McDowall, Inderjit Shargill, Amreen Ahmad, Tanya Walsh, Helen Worthington

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of early class III protraction facemask treatment in children under 10 years of age at 3-year follow-up. Design: Multicentre randomized controlled trial. Subjects and Methods: Seventy-three patients were randomly allocated, stratified for gender, into early class III protraction facemask group (PFG) (n535) and a control/no treatment group (CG) (n538). Outcomes: Dentofacial changes were assessed from lateral cephalograms and occlusal changes using the peer assessment rating (PAR). Self-esteem was assessed using the Piers-Harris children's self-concept scale, and the psychosocial impact ofmalocclusion with oral aesthetic subjective impact score (OASIS) questionnaire. Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) signs and symptoms were also recorded. The time points for data collection were at registration (DC1), 15 months later (DC2) and 3 years post-registration (DC3). Results: The following mean skeletal and occlusal changes occurred from the class III starting point to DC3 (3-year follow-up): SNA, PFG moved forwards + 2.3° (CG forward z1.6u; P=0.14); SNB, PFG moved forwards +0.8° (CG forward + 1.5u, P=0.26); ANB, PFG class III base improved +1.5° (CG stayed about the same at +0.1°; P=0.001). This contributed to an overall difference in ANB between PFG andCGofz1.4u in favour of early protraction facemask treatment. The overjet was still improved by z3.6 mm in the PFG and changed a small amount z1.1 mm in the CG (P=0.001). A 21% improvement in PAR was shown in the PFG and the CG worsened by 8.4% (P=0.02). There was no increase in self-esteem (Piers-Harris score) for PFG compared with the CG (P=0.56) and no statistically significant difference in the impact of malocclusion (OASIS) between groups in terms of the changes from DC1 to DC3 (P=0.18). TMJ signs and symptoms were very low at DC1 and DC3. Conclusions: The favourable effect of early class III protraction facemask treatment undertaken in patients under 10 years of age, is maintained at 3-year follow-up in terms of ANB, overjet and % PAR improvement. The direct protraction treatment effect at SNA is still favourable although not statistically significantly better than the CG. Seventy percent of patients in PFG had maintained a positive overjet which we have defined as ongoing treatment success. Early protraction facemask treatment does not seem to influence self-esteem or reduce the patient's personal impact of their malocclusion at 3-year follow-up. © 2012 British Orthodontic Society.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)176-185
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of Orthodontics
    Volume39
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2012

    Keywords

    • Class III skeletal pattern
    • Early orthopaedic treatment
    • Protraction facemask
    • Randomized controlled trial

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Is early class III protraction facemask treatment effective?Amulticentre, randomized, controlled trial: 3-Year follow-up'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this