Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Is mixed methods social network analysis ethical?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

Abstract

This chapter explores the affordances and limitations of mixed methods social network analysis (MMSNA) from an ethics perspective. In line with Ifenthaler and Schumacher (2016), we define ethics as “a system of fundamental principles and universal values of right conduct”. There may be substantial ethical considerations when conducting MMSNA research in comparison to more “standard” social science approaches: lack of anonymization, potential to identify non-respondents, and identification of “hidden” subgroups. We will use one practical example to highlight potential ethical issues when conducting MMSNA research. We hope that by raising awareness of the potential ethical issues, researchers, practitioners, and the actual participants will become more mindful of the affordances and limitations of MMSNA research approaches.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMixed method social network analysis
Subtitle of host publicationtheories and methodologies in learning and education
EditorsDominik E. Froehlich, Martin Rehm, Bart C. Rienties
Place of PublicationAbingdon
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter16
Pages206-218
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic)9780429056826
ISBN (Print)9780367174453, 9780367174446
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Dec 2019

Keywords

  • research methods
  • mixed methods
  • research methods for social and behavioral sciences
  • research methods in education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is mixed methods social network analysis ethical?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this