Journal recommended guidelines for survey‐based research

Adam B. Wilson; Boon Huat Bay; Jessica N. Byram; Melissa A. Carroll; Gabrielle M. Finn; Niels Hammer; Sabine Hildebrandt; Claudia Krebs; Jonathan J. Wisco; Jason M. Organ

doi:10.1002/ase.2499

Journal recommended guidelines for survey‐based research

Adam B. Wilson, Boon Huat Bay, Jessica N. Byram, Melissa A. Carroll, Gabrielle M. Finn, Niels Hammer, Sabine Hildebrandt, Claudia Krebs, Jonathan J. Wisco, Jason M. Organ

Medical Education (L5)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

Survey-based research is vital in education and social sciences, offering insights into human behaviors and perceptions. The prevalence of such studies in medical education has risen by 33% over the past decade. Despite this growth, the utility of survey findings depends on the study design quality and measure validity. Many manuscripts are rejected due to poor planning and lack of validity evidence. These guidelines aim to improve the rigor and reporting of survey-based research, ensuring credibility and reproducibility. They apply to various survey tools and evaluations, setting a standard for manuscript quality and informing the review process for Anatomical Science Education.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1389-1391
Number of pages	3
Journal	Anatomical Sciences Education
Volume	17
Issue number	7
Early online date	26 Aug 2024
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2499
Publication status	Published - 1 Oct 2024

Keywords

anatomical sciences/medical education
anatomy education
education

Access to Document

10.1002/ase.2499Licence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{dbf7f8e9deeb466b973d78da5a126a35,

title = "Journal recommended guidelines for survey‐based research",

abstract = "Survey-based research is vital in education and social sciences, offering insights into human behaviors and perceptions. The prevalence of such studies in medical education has risen by 33% over the past decade. Despite this growth, the utility of survey findings depends on the study design quality and measure validity. Many manuscripts are rejected due to poor planning and lack of validity evidence. These guidelines aim to improve the rigor and reporting of survey-based research, ensuring credibility and reproducibility. They apply to various survey tools and evaluations, setting a standard for manuscript quality and informing the review process for Anatomical Science Education.",

keywords = "anatomical sciences/medical education, anatomy education, education",

author = "Wilson, {Adam B.} and Bay, {Boon Huat} and Byram, {Jessica N.} and Carroll, {Melissa A.} and Finn, {Gabrielle M.} and Niels Hammer and Sabine Hildebrandt and Claudia Krebs and Wisco, {Jonathan J.} and Organ, {Jason M.}",

year = "2024",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1002/ase.2499",

language = "English",

volume = "17",

pages = "1389--1391",

journal = "Anatomical Sciences Education",

issn = "1935-9772",

publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Journal recommended guidelines for survey‐based research

AU - Wilson, Adam B.

AU - Bay, Boon Huat

AU - Byram, Jessica N.

AU - Carroll, Melissa A.

AU - Finn, Gabrielle M.

AU - Hammer, Niels

AU - Hildebrandt, Sabine

AU - Krebs, Claudia

AU - Wisco, Jonathan J.

AU - Organ, Jason M.

PY - 2024/10/1

Y1 - 2024/10/1

N2 - Survey-based research is vital in education and social sciences, offering insights into human behaviors and perceptions. The prevalence of such studies in medical education has risen by 33% over the past decade. Despite this growth, the utility of survey findings depends on the study design quality and measure validity. Many manuscripts are rejected due to poor planning and lack of validity evidence. These guidelines aim to improve the rigor and reporting of survey-based research, ensuring credibility and reproducibility. They apply to various survey tools and evaluations, setting a standard for manuscript quality and informing the review process for Anatomical Science Education.

AB - Survey-based research is vital in education and social sciences, offering insights into human behaviors and perceptions. The prevalence of such studies in medical education has risen by 33% over the past decade. Despite this growth, the utility of survey findings depends on the study design quality and measure validity. Many manuscripts are rejected due to poor planning and lack of validity evidence. These guidelines aim to improve the rigor and reporting of survey-based research, ensuring credibility and reproducibility. They apply to various survey tools and evaluations, setting a standard for manuscript quality and informing the review process for Anatomical Science Education.

KW - anatomical sciences/medical education

KW - anatomy education

KW - education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85202044152&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ase.2499

DO - 10.1002/ase.2499

M3 - Review article

C2 - 39185621

SN - 1935-9772

VL - 17

SP - 1389

EP - 1391

JO - Anatomical Sciences Education

JF - Anatomical Sciences Education

IS - 7

ER -

Journal recommended guidelines for survey‐based research

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this