Journal recommended guidelines for systematic review and meta-analyses

Adam B. Wilson; Boon Huat Bay; Jessica N. Byram; Melissa A. Carroll; Gabrielle M. Finn; Niels Hammer; Sabine Hildebrandt; Claudia Krebs; Jonathan J. Wisco; Jason M. Organ

doi:10.1002/ase.2500

Journal recommended guidelines for systematic review and meta-analyses

Adam B. Wilson, Boon Huat Bay, Jessica N. Byram, Melissa A. Carroll, Gabrielle M. Finn, Niels Hammer, Sabine Hildebrandt, Claudia Krebs, Jonathan J. Wisco, Jason M. Organ

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses aggregate research findings across studies and populations, making them a valuable form of research evidence. Over the past decade, studies in medical education using these methods have increased by 630%. However, many manuscripts are not publication-ready due to inadequate planning and insufficient analyses. These guidelines aim to improve the clarity and comprehensiveness of reporting methodologies and outcomes, ensuring high quality and comparability. They align with existing standards like PRISMA, providing examples and best practices. Adhering to these guidelines is crucial for publication consideration in Anatomical Sciences Education.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1392-1395
Number of pages	4
Journal	Anatomical Sciences Education
Volume	17
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2500 https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2500
Publication status	Published - Oct 2024

Keywords

Anatomy education
Education
Educational methodology

Access to Document

10.1002/ase.2500Licence: CC BY
10.1002/ase.2500

Cite this

@article{407cc0681ed24edb9b4ed299914b5066,

title = "Journal recommended guidelines for systematic review and meta-analyses",

abstract = "Systematic reviews and meta-analyses aggregate research findings across studies and populations, making them a valuable form of research evidence. Over the past decade, studies in medical education using these methods have increased by 630%. However, many manuscripts are not publication-ready due to inadequate planning and insufficient analyses. These guidelines aim to improve the clarity and comprehensiveness of reporting methodologies and outcomes, ensuring high quality and comparability. They align with existing standards like PRISMA, providing examples and best practices. Adhering to these guidelines is crucial for publication consideration in Anatomical Sciences Education.",

keywords = "Anatomy education, Education, Educational methodology",

author = "Wilson, {Adam B.} and Bay, {Boon Huat} and Byram, {Jessica N.} and Carroll, {Melissa A.} and Finn, {Gabrielle M.} and Niels Hammer and Sabine Hildebrandt and Claudia Krebs and Wisco, {Jonathan J.} and Organ, {Jason M.}",

year = "2024",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1002/ase.2500",

language = "English",

volume = "17",

pages = "1392--1395",

journal = "Anatomical Sciences Education",

issn = "1935-9772",

publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Journal recommended guidelines for systematic review and meta-analyses

AU - Wilson, Adam B.

AU - Bay, Boon Huat

AU - Byram, Jessica N.

AU - Carroll, Melissa A.

AU - Finn, Gabrielle M.

AU - Hammer, Niels

AU - Hildebrandt, Sabine

AU - Krebs, Claudia

AU - Wisco, Jonathan J.

AU - Organ, Jason M.

PY - 2024/10

Y1 - 2024/10

N2 - Systematic reviews and meta-analyses aggregate research findings across studies and populations, making them a valuable form of research evidence. Over the past decade, studies in medical education using these methods have increased by 630%. However, many manuscripts are not publication-ready due to inadequate planning and insufficient analyses. These guidelines aim to improve the clarity and comprehensiveness of reporting methodologies and outcomes, ensuring high quality and comparability. They align with existing standards like PRISMA, providing examples and best practices. Adhering to these guidelines is crucial for publication consideration in Anatomical Sciences Education.

AB - Systematic reviews and meta-analyses aggregate research findings across studies and populations, making them a valuable form of research evidence. Over the past decade, studies in medical education using these methods have increased by 630%. However, many manuscripts are not publication-ready due to inadequate planning and insufficient analyses. These guidelines aim to improve the clarity and comprehensiveness of reporting methodologies and outcomes, ensuring high quality and comparability. They align with existing standards like PRISMA, providing examples and best practices. Adhering to these guidelines is crucial for publication consideration in Anatomical Sciences Education.

KW - Anatomy education

KW - Education

KW - Educational methodology

UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=pure_starter&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:001297308400001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL

U2 - 10.1002/ase.2500

DO - 10.1002/ase.2500

M3 - Article

C2 - 39185603

SN - 1935-9772

VL - 17

SP - 1392

EP - 1395

JO - Anatomical Sciences Education

JF - Anatomical Sciences Education

IS - 7

ER -

Journal recommended guidelines for systematic review and meta-analyses

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this