Justice for whom? The need for a principled approach to deferred prosecution in England and Wales

Sue Hawley, Colin King, Nicholas Lord

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

1423 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs) were introduced in England and Wales in 2014 and five such Agreements have been negotiated to date. Yet, DPAs have not been without controversy. There have been particular concerns relating to the lack of prosecutions brought against individuals; the necessity of self-reporting (and discounted penalties even absent a self-report); as well as the dearth of prosecutions against corporates who have not engaged with the DPA regime. Notwithstanding such concerns, however, DPAs evidently have strong support from parliament, law enforcement and the judiciary. Against that backdrop, this chapter examines experiences to date in England and Wales. The chapter analyses the underlying and purpose of the DPA regime; the approach in each of the Agreements negotiated to date; and what a ‘principled’ DPA regime might look like.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNegotiated settlements in bribery cases
Subtitle of host publicationA Principled Approach
EditorsT. Søreide, A. Makinwa
PublisherEdward Elgar
Number of pages30
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2020

Keywords

  • deferred prosecution
  • agreements (DPAs)
  • negotiation
  • individual prosecutions;
  • self-reporting
  • discounted penalties
  • corporate criminal liability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Justice for whom? The need for a principled approach to deferred prosecution in England and Wales'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this