TY - JOUR
T1 - Justification and good practice in using handheld portable dental X-ray equipment: a position paper prepared by the European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR).
AU - Berkhout, W E R
AU - Suomalainen, A
AU - Brüllmann, D
AU - Jacobs, R
AU - Horner, K
AU - Stamatakis, H C
PY - 2015/2/24
Y1 - 2015/2/24
N2 - Handheld portable X-ray devices are increasingly used for intraoral radiography. This development introduces new challenges to staff and patient safety, for which new or revised risk assessments must be made and acted upon prior to use. Major issues might be: difficulties in using rectangular collimation with beam aiming devices, more complex matching of exposure settings to the x-ray receptor used (e.g. longer exposure times), movements due to the units' weight, protection of the operator and 3rd persons and the use in uncontrolled environments. These problems may result in violation of the ''As Low As Reasonably Achievable'' i.e. ALARA-principle by an increase in (re)exposures compared to the other available intraoral X-ray devices. Hence, the use of handheld portable X-ray devices should be considered only after careful and documented evaluation (which might be done based on medical physics support), when there is evidence that handheld operation has benefits over traditional modalities, and when no new risks to the operators and/or third parties are caused. It is expected, that the use of handheld portable x-ray devices will be very exceptional and for justified situations only. Special attention should be drawn to beam aiming devices, rectangular collimation, the section of the x-ray receptor, focus-skin distance, backscatter shielding and that the unit delivers reproducible dose over the full set of environmental conditions (e.g. battery status and -temperature).
AB - Handheld portable X-ray devices are increasingly used for intraoral radiography. This development introduces new challenges to staff and patient safety, for which new or revised risk assessments must be made and acted upon prior to use. Major issues might be: difficulties in using rectangular collimation with beam aiming devices, more complex matching of exposure settings to the x-ray receptor used (e.g. longer exposure times), movements due to the units' weight, protection of the operator and 3rd persons and the use in uncontrolled environments. These problems may result in violation of the ''As Low As Reasonably Achievable'' i.e. ALARA-principle by an increase in (re)exposures compared to the other available intraoral X-ray devices. Hence, the use of handheld portable X-ray devices should be considered only after careful and documented evaluation (which might be done based on medical physics support), when there is evidence that handheld operation has benefits over traditional modalities, and when no new risks to the operators and/or third parties are caused. It is expected, that the use of handheld portable x-ray devices will be very exceptional and for justified situations only. Special attention should be drawn to beam aiming devices, rectangular collimation, the section of the x-ray receptor, focus-skin distance, backscatter shielding and that the unit delivers reproducible dose over the full set of environmental conditions (e.g. battery status and -temperature).
U2 - 10.1259/dmfr.20140343
DO - 10.1259/dmfr.20140343
M3 - Article
C2 - 25710118
SN - 1476-542X
JO - Dento maxillo facial radiology
JF - Dento maxillo facial radiology
ER -